by davidpenalosa » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:16 pm
Hi Folks,
I’d like to respond to a few of the statements made so far on this subject.
>>Quinto Governor II: “I heard an interview with Mongo Santamaria, where some musician in his band was asking about clave, and Mongo only response was, either you feel clave or you don't.”
It’s hard for us to imagine what it would have been like to grow up hearing rumba in a Cuban barrio during the mid-20th Century, as Mongo did. Drummers from that time didn’t “learn clave” in the same way we did. The only experience I’ve had that can even come close to this is perhaps my knowledge of Beatles melodies and lyrics. I didn’t have to “study” the Beatles’ music in order to “learn” it. I was around it so much (radio, records) in the 60’s that I “learned” it through osmosis.
While learning through the aural tradition as Mongo and other Cubans have done is the best way, it certainly is not the only way. It’s possible to witness the flip side of this when one considers the struggles Cuban musicians have had in trying to learn to play jazz with the proper emphasis. As we all know though, there are many outstanding Cuban jazz musicians and many outstanding non-Cuban congueros.
>>Raymond: “So the clave has a reason. It feels ackward when you are playing or singing out of clave. It should not be big deal but there is the option of "placing" everything in the accent of the clave and it sounds nicer.”
Depending on the genre involved, there are requisite con-clave (with-clave) parts and contra-clave (not with-clave) parts within an ensemble arrangement. In other words, not all the parts reinforce the strokes of clave (if that’s what you meant to say). The problem arises when the requisite con-clave parts are in a cruzado (reversed and incorrect) position. Some rhythmic figures have some latitude, but it’s not a case of “anything goes”. It takes time to learn these subtleties and in fact, many of them are subjective judgment calls.
>>Raymond: “New Cuban music "plays" with the clave in giving emphasis or accents out of the clave in the choruses and/or jumping the order of the bar by going 3/2 bar, 2/3 bar and then going with another 2/3 bar. (By the way, it was done back in the Golden era of salsa too).”
Yes, timba takes a lot of liberties with clave, far more than were done back in the Golden era of salsa. In fact, there are particular expressions of “clave license” found in timba that I don’t believe have been done before. This phenomena is controversial and has caused somewhat of a “clave schism” in our music.
>>Franc: “how about when you doing a solo?? please tell me how you think about the clave?”
Of course, eventually you want to have your sense of clave so internalized that you don’t have to “think” about it any longer, you just feel it. But that takes time. There’s a lot of freedom in soloing against a montuno as opposed to playing a lead drum part for a traditional folkloric rhythm. In the case of the latter, one is expected to quote particular phrases and improvise within more defined parameters. My suggestion is to first learn a relatively simple folkloric lead drum vocabulary, like bembe caja (mid-20th Century style). The caja phrases have a specific relation to clave. Next learn rumba quinto and again, listen to sources from the mid-20th Century, like early Munequitos, Mongo and Los Papines. Learn the quinto vocabulary in relation to clave. Finally, study the solos of the early band congueros: Mongo, Tata, etc., and of course, make sure you know how those licks relate to clave. Basically, listen to the older, slower and simpler solos to understand what’s going on.
>>Quinto Governor II: “My uneducated opinion is that for popular music at least ( salsa and latin jazz ) the clave beat is simply superimposed over the music. Maybe another way to say it is that, the music comes first than the clave”
In my opinion, good popular music is “organically” structured in clave, just like folkloric music.
-David