by blango » Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:56 am
Seriously,
I was joking about 32nds. like someone said earlier, notation in 8ths is a good reminder of what the rhythm is like. and memory serves as the final guide.
I think many western/northern players think of music like mathematicians. I certainly don’t. try to explain a Rembrandt with math.
funny story.. i know a really bright nuclear physicist. he was so smart that the government made him an offer he couldn’t refuse, right out of school. - No ****, they actually told him, according to him, that he could not work for anyone else, legally.
So, long short,
he quit physics at 30 yrs old because he always had to assign a value to infinity to get his mathematic models to more closely resemble the actual results in the natural world. He came to the conclusion that mathematics is inherently flawed, and should be redeveloped from the ground up. Something the unification theory might clear up, one of these days.
Wow, what a conversation. And since then, i see the limitations of western notation in the same way.
its like we are trying to model a multidimensional world with linear models. Very limiting and useless to spend too much time perusing.
Notation, for Cuban Folklore, for example, can be seen as cheat sheets - just shorthand reminders of what actually is.
32nd are never used for a reason. its useless to even try to read and play. Unless you are playing very very slowly - harder to 'feel' as most listening material is at a higher tempo.
Notation, for learning, should allow you to play and read at the correct tempo for the given rhythm.
Lastly, the great European players of the bay area do not play like Cubanos. they play a more close to the vest, by the book style. This, to me, is a mistake. One needs to learn the math, and then put it aside and hope it creeps into your persuit of feel. - for you mensa members: grammar is to poetry, as notation is to music :laugh:
Tony