ranger42 wrote:i guess it really comes down to personal preference.
however, seeing as i am a beginner i am not quite sure what that preference is yet.
all the musicians i have spoken to, including my teacher, play both.
i currently have the aspires, does that make a difference as skins go?
i just want to be able to enhance my skills without having to worry about tuning.
ranger42,
You're right. It comes down to personal preference. Personally, I prefer Fiberskyns. I have them on all my Gon Bops CA Series congas which I use when I play with either of my 2 amplified bands. (For playing unplugged--mostly Latin jazz jamming--I prefer to use my Isla Percussion congas with genuine calfskins.)
I chose Fiberskyn for its supposedly-greater sound volume and brighter sound--not to mention the very convenient feature of not having the need/urge to retune (true for all synthetic heads) your congas due to changes in temperature, especially right smack in the middle of a live gig. And it's true. Fiberskyns do significantly help the sound volume of my congas cut through the entire band mix. Fiberskyns supposedly ring more than Nuskyns but, within an amplified band scenario, I can barely hear the ringing. The bottom line for me is: Overall, I'm pleased with Fiberskyns.
I've tried Nukyns mounted on a pair of bongos owned by a friend and I didn't like them at all. What's been said is true: It's too smooth and the feel is too plasticky and slippery for me. Also, it sounded more "dead" to me.
I much prefer the rougher feel of Fiberskyns, although I've noticed that the unique coating has started to wear off particularly above the bearing edge of the quinto where I hit my slaps. For this reason, I'd be willing to try out Skyndeeps (Calfskin version only) as future replacements--unless Remo comes up with an even better product. I've read that with Skyndeeps the texture/graphic is embedded permanently into the skin itself, thus precluding such wear and tear.
Best of luck,