RitmoBoricua wrote:Watco oil like a golden oak
That assumes your shells are made of oak. If mahogany, or any other wood species you may prefer an un-tinted oil finish.
Tinted oil finishes are used in two ways:
To
change the color of the tone of the grain of a particular wood.
Example: Putting red mahogany tinted oil finish on oak, or cherry shells
OR
To
enhance and even out the color of the tone of a particular wood grain.
Example: Putting golden oak tinted oil finish on oak shell or putting red mahogany tinted oil finish on mahogany shell.
Some woods have variable tones of color in their natural grain. In example 2, you are essentially staining them the same color that they would be naturally. Treating them this way makes the natural color more consistent in the varied grain of the wood.
You can use an un-tinted oil finish and it will not affect (change/enhance/even out) color of wood grain at all.
What you see is what you get: naked / natural grain color, deepened by oil penetration.
If you want to see what that might look like before you commit, soak a rag in mineral spirits and wipe down bare sanded shell (which should ready for refinishing). You will get a good idea of what it will look like with un-tinted oil treatment. The mineral spirits will evaporate rather quickly, as well serve to wipe off any dust/dirt on the shell.
You can then decide if you want to go natural or change or enhance the color of the grain of your particular shell.
jorge wrote:For looks, my favorite is Watco Danish oil finish on oak, although it does have some other downsides.... This brings out the wood grain and natural beauty ... and is very easy to touch up if you get scratches or gouges. The downside is that for some climates like NYC where the humidity cycles from very humid in the summer to very dry in the winter, the oak cracks easily, mainly the glue joints between staves. This happened on both of my Watco finished SoS oak drums and on neither of my polyurethane finished oak SoS drums. I haven't tried oil finish on mahogany or cherry, they may be less likely to crack with humidity changes
I agree with all that you say there Jorge.
What you are pointing out is the different expansion/contraction factors of the different species of wood used for the shells.
Different woods shrink and swell (depending on ambient humidity) at different rates.
Unsealed oak apparently expands/contracts a lot. I don't know about mahogany or cherry.
When an oil finish only is applied, the wood has soaked up some oil, but is not sealed from the environment.
When a coating is applied (lacquer, poly, paint) the wood surface is in effect "mummified" and the wood surface is isolated from the air...and the moisture it may or may not contain. Hence, the expansion/contraction of the wood is reduced.
Although I love the look an oil finish, I lean toward sealing stave constructed wood shells for long term stability.
For two reasons:
1) The wood is already somewhat stressed ..usually because of steam bending of staves. Isla and Volcano brand drum shells are exceptions as the staves for those drums are cut to shape...making a much more stable wood shell construction.
2) The stressed wood staves have 60+ linear feet of glue joints between them.
............factor in unsealed wood, seasonally shrinking and swelling, and the very good possibility that the wood and the glue in those 60 feet of joints having different expansion/ contraction factors (the wood shrinks and swells a lot, the glue probably not at all), and it's logical to assume it's only a matter of time before a crack occurs along the glue joint lines of an unsealed shell.
Here's a comparative on final sealing finishes I snatched off web:
Polyurethane:A brushable finish widely touted to the do-it-yourselfer as the "be all" finish that is suppose to be water proof and superhard. The problem is that it is a thick finish that frequently shows brush marks and turns yellow with age. It is a hard finish but hard also means brittle, a finish that flakes, scratches and chips easily as a result, and is not repairable. Because it is rigid it does not flex with the wood and so any wood expansion creates hairline flaws, allowing moisture to get underneath causing white areas and finish lifting. When the finish does deteriorate, as it will eventually, it is extremely difficult to strip and refinish.
Lacquer:It a finish that must be sprayed and is widely used by furniture manufacturers and refinishers. It is water clear and never changes color. It is repairable. With the acrylic additive that we use, it is flexible. It becomes the most moisture, alcohol, chip and scratch resistant finish you can use.
Water-based Lacquer:Many furniture manufacturers now use water based lacquer in order to meet EPA regulations. It takes on a slightly cloudy or milky look, is very thin and brittle, and easily damaged. It is only moderately repairable.
Brushable Lacquer:There is a product by Deft brand called "clear wood finish" that is the only brushable lacquer that exists. It smells terrible while curing and it takes at least three coats. It is what we recommend to the DIYer. The secret to using it is to use a very good brush and apply thin coats.
Whatever you use, if you combine products (oil/poly, oil/lacquer) make sure products are compatible, meaning that they will not have an adverse reaction with each other. Putting polyurethane over lacquer is a no-no. Always best to do a sample first.
Hope this contributes somewhat to the conversation.