Page 1 of 1
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:42 pm 
				by jmdriscoll
				I have a decent sized collection of books related to playing congas and bongo. One of the books that I have had for years, but have never done myuch with is "Conga Drumming - a beginners guide to playing with time. -  by Alan Dworsky" Maybe because a lot of patterns are geared toward multiple players with seperate quinto, conga and tumba parts, and up until recently, I have never had a practice partner and have always practiced alone. It covers a few multi-person patterns such as guaguanco rumba, 6/8 bembe's, bomba, etc..  
Has anybody had any experience with the rhythms in this book? Good, bad? Accurate or close to the true style of multi-person playing?
M
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:42 pm 
				by jmdriscoll
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:32 pm 
				by burke
				This a pretty pointless thing to say but no I'm not familar with it.
Why bother? Cause I know it totally sucks to have a legit question ignored and sometimes even a stupid reply can stimulate the dudes out there.
Come yall! Help the guy out fer Ch%&^#ts sake!
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:52 am 
				by Changuiri
				LISTEN TO THE CD AND SEE IF YOU LIKE WHAT YOU HEAR, THAT'S WHAT IT COMES DOWN TO.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:37 pm 
				by jmdriscoll
				Hey, thanks for the encouraging posts guys. No worries though.. maybe not a lot of people have purchased this book before. I dig some of the grooves, but just wanted to make sure that the parts were the "actual traditional" multi-person patterns played for these rhythms... "Guaguanco, Bembe, and Bomba" before I dive too deep into them only to find out that I am not playing them correctly. Maybe I'll compare these rhythms to the ones listed in the congabook to see if they are the same.
MD
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:48 pm 
				by Gallichio
				I like the book but don't like the notation it uses. other wise it's OK