by Light Seeker » Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:58 am
Today, on two separate occasions, I have been told that congas are "macho" instruments. What do you think of this?
Personally, I disagree. Instruments cannot be macho. The people playing the instruments can be macho. I would, however, call the congas energetic instruments. I would even go so far as to say they are masculine instruments (emphasizing a difference between "macho" and "masculine"). The reason I am averse to calling it a macho instrument is because for me personally, music is a spiritual path, and I believe that machismo is related to the ego, which is something I strive to shed through my musical spiritual path. So, being macho, which is to say being excessively showy, competitive, dominating, and often arrogant, is completely at odds with what I'm trying to be, as a musician, and as a human being. One can't transcend the mundane when one is attached to egoic pursuits.
This post might sound trivial, but it's important to me to know if there are others out there who understand and agree with what I'm saying. So what do you think? Is machismo a requisite to playing congas?
But also, perhaps it's just a problem of semantics. Maybe the people who told me the instrument was "macho" just meant that it's "masculine".